Eleiko Powerlifting Plates, Bars and Collars - Official USA Distributor




WPC Worlds Reports

(updated 11/24 8:41 am)

Reports are emerging from the WPC World Championships which began on Thursday and wrapped up Sunday in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. WPO Lightweight favorites Brian Schwab and Al Caslow, 165's, both bombed out of the meet. Schwab on the squat and Caslow on the bench press.

In the WPO Middleweight battle, Chris Jenkins, Sergey Nalyeykin, and Shawn Frankl turned in the top performances in the 181, 198, and 220 classes. Michael Cartinian, 181, moved to bench only and Adam Driggers, 198, and Clint Smith, 220, bombed out of the competiton.

Unofficial Open Division Powerlifting Results
Men
181
1. Chris Jenkins 727/490/710 - 1,928
4. Lee Cutler

198
1. Sergey Nalyeykin - 969/683/661 - 2,314
4. Pat Griffin
6. Steve Plunkett
?. Jason Coker

220
1. Shawn Frankl 1,003/815/716 - 2,539
2. Paul Newell 848/462/672 - 1,984
3. Luke Healy 672/529/639 - 1,840

242
2. Jo Jordan 903/621/688 - 2,215
Delroy McQueen 793/?/771 -

275
1. Jose Garcia 1,041/645/830 - 2,525
2. Sergey Karnaukhov
3. Anthony Carlquist 935/705/771 - 2,411
4. Karl Tillman 942/611/805 - 2,260
5. Mark Griffiths 903/518/727 - 2,149
6. Graham Matison 749/545/650 - 1,945

308
1. Greg Theriot
2. Scott Cartwright 1,063/661/
3. Al Mehan

Shw
1. Andy Bolton 1,146/688/942 - 2,777
2. Kari Kalliola
Tibor Meszaros

Women
165
Shannon Harnett 584/303/527 - 1,414

Bombs
Brian Schwab (165)
Al Caslow (165) 843/
Adam Driggers (198)
Clint Smith (220)
Brian Carroll (242)
Mark Cullimore (242) 837/
Ben Williams (275)
Garry Frank (Shw) 1,053/

Unofficial Open Division Bench Press Results
Men
165
1. Kalin Chester - 573

Shw
1. Scot Mendelson - 1,025

Jane Stabile reports at Outlaws: "I was only there Thursday (women, teens, juniors) and Friday (master men) and don't have a lot of numbers, but I can report that on both days there were many, many lifters-- two platforms running all the time-- from about 20 countries. Judging was very tough but I didn't hear anybody complaining about unfairness I think WPC is trying (successfully) to get its credibility back on the squat depth judging. Thursday I was competing so I didn't get to watch so much, but Shannon Hartnett did some huge lifts, Mel Harris beat me with a bench around 250 (but my 385 lb squat was a 148-lb Master4 WR), Shany Gilbert, (18, 165) totalled about 1160, and Lee Denmon brought a big group of very strong teens... A tiny, rather old English lady did token lifts with a broken arm... Richard Singh from Canada benched 550 but missed 600. On Friday I was blown away by the huge squats (some successful, some not.)To see "older" guys squatting in the 750+ pound range is a real inspiration. Andy Bolton got a 1017-lb squat. Russ Barlow made just under 800 (797, maybe?). Gregg Damminga made his squat opener but missed something over 900. Benching was equally impressive. Sorry I don't have more numbers, and I hope somebody puts some up soon. Lots and lots of bombs on squat and several on bench."

It's reported at the Powerlifting UK forum that Brit Neil Deighton, 198, bench pressed 661 pounds.

Other Outlaws reports, including one that says that Mari Asp, 123, set a new world record bench press.

Comment viewing options

What did cartinian bench?

andy bolton made his 1st and 2nd attempts on squat, got reds on his third... he was very shaky and came up somewhat out of control and racked it before the rack command, his third was 1168.

The judging so far has been perfect. Making everyone everyday take them deep and were they are supposed to be.

Gary Frank got his 2nd attempt squat and Scott Cartwright got his third in.

Jose Garcia got his third in with a super fast 1018. Brian Carrol bombed, Clint Smith bombed and shawn frankl finished with a beautiful 1003.

Al Caslow was sick on the squats, killing them all ending with 843 then he failed to lockout all three attempts at 541. Brian Schwab appeared to just be off on this day, very unstable looking.

Sergey Naleykin was great on squats, barely got his third bench in to stay alive and only hit like 660 or 680 deadlift, and it wasn't easy, he missed 727 twice.

Jason Coker I believe went 3 for 9. Hitting his lifts on third attempts but all his lifts looked very good and solid.

what did Gary frank squat?

Frank had a 1053 squat.

any updates on bolton?

Hearing reports that there were alot of bombouts. Supposedly Russian judges and some American judge(s) were calling squat depth from the head chair - ridiculous.
400+ lifters, if the judging was bad, next year it will be much smaller meet. dissappointing.
Rumor that Gary Frank tore bicep in the bench.
Scot Mendelson benched 1000+ succesfully, missing 1080 on 4th attempt. Opened at 903...

Scott Hoss Cartwright hit 1063 squat and a 661 bench so far.

Donnie Thompson hit 1230 squat and a 910 bench!!!
800 pound pull gives him 2940!!! or 860 would give him 3000!!!

Mark Bell
Owner of Super Training in Sacramento.
www.supertraininggym.com

Jeff68 wrote:
Hearing reports that there were alot of bombouts. Supposedly Russian judges and some American judge(s) were calling squat depth from the head chair - ridiculous.

What is ridiculous about following the rules in the rule book?

Anonymous wrote:
Jeff68 wrote:
Hearing reports that there were alot of bombouts. Supposedly Russian judges and some American judge(s) were calling squat depth from the head chair - ridiculous.

What is ridiculous about following the rules in the rule book?

it would have to be BLATANTLY high to call it from the head chair or you are a JACKASS... no offense to Mark Bell...lol

JackAss wrote:
Scott Hoss Cartwright hit 1063 squat and a 661 bench so far.

Donnie Thompson hit 1230 squat and a 910 bench!!!
800 pound pull gives him 2940!!! or 860 would give him 3000!!!

Mark Bell
Owner of Super Training in Sacramento.
www.supertraininggym.com

THAT IS THE SHZIT!!!!!! Mark... update as soon as possible brother... now I'm hyped like a motherf*cker!!!!!!!!!

My training partner goes 3 for 4.

Scot Mendelson made lifts at 985, 1014! and 1025!
He took a fourth at 1080 and missed at lockout.

Congrats, Mendy! You worked harder than I have ever seen you this past training cycle.

Priest

Putt, perhaps you should read what the person said first. Its ridiculous to call depth from the front, even though the WPC rulebook does not differentiate from any referee calling depth. IF you want to claim that the front referee calling depth is ridiculous, then you would be the jackass.

Thanks Putt.
Lets not get in a debate about judging the squat. Anyone with a judges card knows that from front chair you do not call depth unless it is ridiculously high.
Anonymous- read the rule book and take the test.
Then again, you are probably not even a competitor. Just an internet tough guy ?

I'd never be glad to see anyone bomb, it's a shame for those who it happened to, but Schwabs youtube did not do him any justice, if he was squatting to the depth he was in his training, there was never a chance of him getting them squats in, he's wayyy you wide and not flexible enough. hard luck and better luck next time.

Awesome results so far. especially neil deighton benching 300kgs @ 90kgs and still a junior as far as i know!!

I am a referee, are you? You point out in the rulebook where it states about teh head referee and squat depth.

Correction, My training partner goes 3 for 4.

Scot Mendelson made lifts at 903, 1014! and 1025!
He took a fourth at 1080 and missed at lockout.

Congrats, Mendy! You worked harder than I have ever seen you this past training cycle.

Priest

what about andy bolton?

what did andy bench anyone know???

how long til donnie deadlifts?

andy benched 688. He opened at 633, went 672, and got 688 on his third. He had 700 in him easily, all of his lifts were really easy. He pulled 942 and gave 1003 plus chips a ride but couldn't get it past his knees.

any results for delroy mcqueen 242 class afaik

What did donnie get in the deads?

Priest wrote:
Correction, My training partner goes 3 for 4.

Scot Mendelson made lifts at 903, 1014! and 1025!
He took a fourth at 1080 and missed at lockout.

Congrats, Mendy! You worked harder than I have ever seen you this past training cycle.

Priest

Now those are some huge number on the World stage. Great job Scot. Wish I could have been there. Looks like the FIT EXPO is going to be a VERY AWESOME SUPER SHOW again. I hope Gary is ok. He is a great lifter and person and I hope he heals up quickly. Again, great lifting Scot. I will see you back in Cali in January.

bolton totalled around 2730lb? is that 2nd place to donnie?

Anonymous wrote:
Putt, perhaps you should read what the person said first. Its ridiculous to call depth from the front, even though the WPC rulebook does not differentiate from any referee calling depth. IF you want to claim that the front referee calling depth is ridiculous, then you would be the jackass.

I'm don't want to highjack this thread with a response so come to SPF Record Breakers next weekend in TN and talk that jackass sh*t to my face f*cker......

WTF did donnie pull damnit???

donnie pulled 861!!! 3001 LB total BABY!!!

Didd Gary frank tear his bicep?

Anonymous wrote:
donnie pulled 861!!! 3001 LB total BABY!!!

Oh, my God, that is amazing!!!! Way to go, Donnie!!!! Anyone doubt that he's the strongest guy out there right now?! He just bypassed the 2900's and went from 2850 to 3001 in the total!!!!

3001lb total? HOLY FUCK!!!!!

Anonymous wrote:
andy benched 688. He opened at 633, went 672, and got 688 on his third. He had 700 in him easily, all of his lifts were really easy. He pulled 942 and gave 1003 plus chips a ride but couldn't get it past his knees.

weird that in over two years andy not only hasnt broken the 1003 but hasnt even been able to dublicate it.

weird that in over two years andy not only hasnt broken the 1003 but hasnt even been able to dublicate it.[/quote]

do you think maybe hes peaked? i just dont see him improving much these days either?

donnie pulled 7 something, but who knows really, if you know a judge ask them, they would know.

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
andy benched 688. He opened at 633, went 672, and got 688 on his third. He had 700 in him easily, all of his lifts were really easy. He pulled 942 and gave 1003 plus chips a ride but couldn't get it past his knees.

weird that in over two years andy not only hasnt broken the 1003 but hasnt even been able to dublicate it.

Duplicating a lift that's so far out ahead of what the majority do isn't going to be easy. That he got 942 today is a testament to the man's incredible deadlifting ability.

yunglifter wrote:
donnie pulled 7 something, but who knows really, if you know a judge ask them, they would know.

Oh, really? So the 3001 didn't happen? I damn near pissed myself when I heard he hit 3001. Still, 2900+ is incredible!

M wrote:
Oh, really? So the 3001 didn't happen? I damn near pissed myself when I heard he hit 3001. Still, 2900+ is incredible!

I heard 760 for 2905. Big stuff any way you cut it.

Donnie 1235-910-760 2905

how did minuth and carroll do?

Why the low deadlift? He has done 800raw before... Did he miss his 3rd?

Results from OBB team:
Wayne Flesh 16-17 (teen) (117 lbs)Thursday
Squat 325, Bench 159, Pulled 275 =760 Total Took 1st Place

Daniel Tinjero Junior 165 (164 lbs)Thursday
Squat 738, Bench 551, Pulled 639 =1928 Total Took 1st Place and Heavy wt JR Best Lifter

Dutch Flesh Master 220 (40-44)(209 lbs)Friday
Squat 804, Benched 512, Pulled 606 =1922 Took 1st place

Brain Schwab Open 165 (159 lbs)Saturday Unfortunately Disqualified

Kalin Chester Open 165 Bench only Saturday
Bench 573 Took 1st Place & Best Lifter

Joe Jordan is competing today so all I know is he got his 3rd squat 903, bench 621.14, pulled 688.14 waiting for awards info.

Team OBB did very well. Congrats to all!

maybe the "low" deadlift is because of his previous monstrous squat and bench

Einar Herpes wrote:
maybe the "low" deadlift is because of his previous monstrous squat and bench

I have all the respect for Donnie and his lifting and i was only asking a question.

Pete Wells wrote:
Donnie 1235-910-760 2905

Wow!! Remember when 2400 was thought to be almost impossible?

GO Donnie!!!!!

Putt Houston

Andy and Donnie did not compete in the same competition.

Congrats to all that did well !

I heard Earlier reference to squat judging was commented by many lifters at the meet.
1 side judge gives white, other side judge gives red on depth, head judge gives red on depth. This just doesnt sound right. If it was close enough for side judges to be split, how the hell can the head judge tell from his position if the lifter broke parallel ?
Just a thought, may have upset alot of lifters. May not have the number of lifters next year, to bad because APF/WPC is the best federation HANDS DOWN.

Anonymous wrote:
donnie pulled 861!!! 3001 LB total BABY!!!

Get outta here.
Holy Shit, that is amazing.

frankl got an 800 bench in

this weekend shows exactly whats wrong with the sport.. the top two SHWs both lifting... but in different meets

i agree its ridiculous that you get bolton to the states on the same weekend and they do diff comps lol does anyone know any of the other winners?

any results for delroy mcqueen 242

Jeff68 wrote:
Congrats to all that did well !

I heard Earlier reference to squat judging was commented by many lifters at the meet.
1 side judge gives white, other side judge gives red on depth, head judge gives red on depth. This just doesnt sound right. If it was close enough for side judges to be split, how the hell can the head judge tell from his position if the lifter broke parallel ?

Because by the rules of the federation, the head judge is doing his job.

Jose Garcia went 1041-645~830's for 2525.... has anyone heard how the overall WPO stuff went?

Anonymous wrote:
Jeff68 wrote:
Congrats to all that did well !

I heard Earlier reference to squat judging was commented by many lifters at the meet.
1 side judge gives white, other side judge gives red on depth, head judge gives red on depth. This just doesnt sound right. If it was close enough for side judges to be split, how the hell can the head judge tell from his position if the lifter broke parallel ?

Because by the rules of the federation, the head judge is doing his job.

SHOW ME an animation / drawing / ANYTHING... in ANY FEDERATION's rule book where they draw the lifter FROM THE FRONT POINT OF VIEW squatting and breaking parrallel telling you exactly where to call it. SHOW ME!!!! I'm from Missouri... SHOW ME MOTHERF*CKERS...SHOW ME! SHOW ME! SHOW ME!

Oh that's right 'cause you can't! It would be physically impossible to draw.

You don't have to have a PhD in physics to know that squat depth is derived from two exact points. If one point (the hip joint) is out of your feild of view AND YOU CAN'T SPACIALLY REFERENCE IT TO ANOTHER POINT (THE TOP SURFACE OF THE KNEE, then how can you scientifically determine a parallel line without determining EXACTLY where the other point is AND EXACTLY where it is in reference to the other point.

Come on students, let's get with the program.

The bible said Jesus walked on water, so since it was written in a book I guess I have to believe it then right.

Let's agree that the rule book should be re-written.

Using anonymous retarded logic, I guess the head judge can call your ass coming off the bench too then and it would be acceptable even if the side judges gave white for it.

Just call what you can see. From the front, you can't see proper depth so leave that to the side judges, just like you let them call for the butt coming off the bench in the bench press.

Putt Houston... out

So Putt must agree with all 'hidden' rules like the ones in the IPF. Just because they are not written into the rule book doesnt mean we cannot make them up as we go along. Right Putt?

Just becuase you are incapable of doing something, lets not hold back others who are capable. There are three referees, they all have the ability to flick a red for anything that does not meet with the rules of performance. Whether YOU like it or not.

and by comparing bench to squat, you are showing that you have no idea what you are talking about.

M Flesh wrote:
Results from OBB team:
Wayne Flesh 16-17 (teen) (117 lbs)Thursday
Squat 325, Bench 159, Pulled 275 =760 Total Took 1st Place

Daniel Tinjero Junior 165 (164 lbs)Thursday
Squat 738, Bench 551, Pulled 639 =1928 Total Took 1st Place and Heavy wt JR Best Lifter

Dutch Flesh Master 220 (40-44)(209 lbs)Friday
Squat 804, Benched 512, Pulled 606 =1922 Took 1st place

Brain Schwab Open 165 (159 lbs)Saturday Unfortunately Disqualified

Kalin Chester Open 165 Bench only Saturday
Bench 573 Took 1st Place & Best Lifter

Joe Jordan is competing today so all I know is he got his 3rd squat 903, bench 621.14, pulled 688.14 waiting for awards info.

Team OBB did very well. Congrats to all!

Tinajero was a 181. Not a 165

Anonymous wrote:
So Putt must agree with all 'hidden' rules like the ones in the IPF. Just because they are not written into the rule book doesnt mean we cannot make them up as we go along. Right Putt?

Just becuase you are incapable of doing something, lets not hold back others who are capable. There are three referees, they all have the ability to flick a red for anything that does not meet with the rules of performance. Whether YOU like it or not.

prove me wrong then. draw a picture from the front and show me and everyone else on here, in words, and by depiction, how you determined depth.

"Just because they are not written into the rule book doesnt mean we cannot make them up as we go along. Right Putt?"

how is not throwing a red light for something impossible to determine "making sh*t up as I go along?"

"they all have the ability to flick a red for anything that does not meet with the rules of performance."

so by your logic then... the next time you bench I'm going to give you a red light from the head chair because I saw your hips move and determined your butt came off the bench.... see how the f*ck you like it.

might as well say "thanks for the $3,000 you paid to fly and get here, compete, eat and everything else, I just bombed you out. The whole time, the other side judge is looking at you like you're an idiot and just ruined this guys trip for no reason, because from his perfect view from the side, it was below parallel.

...and sign your name if you're going to throw down with me and defend your position, otherwise walk away you anonymous coward.

Anonymous wrote:
and by comparing bench to squat, you are showing that you have no idea what you are talking about.

I know more about powerlifting then you will EVER know.

I was comparing the rules of performance to other areas where I thought even a stupid person would finally understand and establish a connection with. apparently I was wrong.

you have to wear a helmet around sharp objects don't you?

Jeez I thought it was only Gratton that talked garbage, but Putt appears to be taking a leaf out of his book.

OF course a head referee can make a call on something that he sees is wrong.
If the person is obviously high, they get a red.
If the judge cannot tell specifically then the judgement goes for the lifter.

This is the same as any referee.

Hell, the WPO rules went out of their way to say the head referee could judge, but htey put in the term "only if its blatantly obvious", otherwise known as the Mike Miller clause.

There is a major difference between the butt on a bench (that the referee may not beable to see) and the height of the hips at the bottom of the squat (blocked by the lifter), which the referee can see.

But I am sure he thinks the head ref just sits there flicking whites no matter how the depth looks from the front. Next he will challange everyone to measure their johnson and the start talking about how his kids could kick all the otehr kids butts.

it was a bugger to see Caslow bombing, especially after a great buildup and an awsome squat.

JC Carter wrote:
Jeez I thought it was only Gratton that talked garbage, but Putt appears to be taking a leaf out of his book.

OF course a head referee can make a call on something that he sees is wrong.
If the person is obviously high, they get a red.
If the judge cannot tell specifically then the judgement goes for the lifter.

This is the same as any referee.

Hell, the WPO rules went out of their way to say the head referee could judge, but htey put in the term "only if its blatantly obvious", otherwise known as the Mike Miller clause.

There is a major difference between the butt on a bench (that the referee may not beable to see) and the height of the hips at the bottom of the squat (blocked by the lifter), which the referee can see.

But I am sure he thinks the head ref just sits there flicking whites no matter how the depth looks from the front. Next he will challange everyone to measure their johnson and the start talking about how his kids could kick all the otehr kids butts.

maybe this is a misprint:

"the height of the hips at the bottom of the squat (blocked by the lifter), which the referee can see."

if it's blocked by the lifter how can he see it? that's my whole point.

the head referee has many things to look at, so a brigade of continuous white lights wouldn't suggest the only thing he is looking at is squat depth. I know that was meant to be more humorous than serious... the depiction of the head ref flicking white lights all day, because of course he will never judge depth from the front if you take my stance. As a head ref, I'm just not going to call depth unless it's crazy high (5 inches)

we are in total agreement:
"If the person is obviously high, they get a red.
If the judge cannot tell specifically then the judgement goes for the lifter."

...and thanks JC, I'm just not as angry when there is a name behind the post.

i meant the (blocked by the lifter) to do with the bench.

I have called depth from the front, but not as often as i have from the side. The call goes for the lifter most of the time.

To say that the Centre Referee can't judge squat depth is nonsense. Of course it's not as advantageous as a side referee's view, everyone knows that, but that doesn't alter the fact that it's part of his job - that's why we have three referees. Virtually all of the audiense - and usually the video viewing public have a view from the front, and that's never stopped anyone from giving an opinion on squat depth.

Another thing, the Centre Referee can't 'bomb' anyone for depth, it takes two red lights at least, and on three occasions at that.

Bench Press and butt up. The Rules say it's an infringement of the rules, and a cause for failure, for "any change in the elected lifting position or raising of the buttocks....". It doesn't say the butt has to be off the bench. The Centre Referee doesn't have to see daylight between the butt and the bench to fail a lift for raising the buttocks.

If you can't referee all three lifts from the Centre Referee's then don't sit in the chair.

Putt Houston wrote:

"If the person is obviously high, they get a red.

That's why a little visine goes a long in this sport.

Sorry, y'all- but you boys are taking this way too seriously.

Anonymous wrote:
M Flesh wrote:
Results from OBB team:
Wayne Flesh 16-17 (teen) (117 lbs)Thursday
Squat 325, Bench 159, Pulled 275 =760 Total Took 1st Place

Daniel Tinjero Junior 165 (164 lbs)Thursday
Squat 738, Bench 551, Pulled 639 =1928 Total Took 1st Place and Heavy wt JR Best Lifter

Dutch Flesh Master 220 (40-44)(209 lbs)Friday
Squat 804, Benched 512, Pulled 606 =1922 Took 1st place

Brain Schwab Open 165 (159 lbs)Saturday Unfortunately Disqualified

Kalin Chester Open 165 Bench only Saturday
Bench 573 Took 1st Place & Best Lifter

Joe Jordan is competing today so all I know is he got his 3rd squat 903, bench 621.14, pulled 688.14 waiting for awards info.

Team OBB did very well. Congrats to all!

Tinajero was a 181. Not a 165


Sorry I knew that but had 165 stuck in my head.

Anonymous wrote:
M Flesh wrote:
Results from OBB team:
Wayne Flesh 16-17 (teen) (117 lbs)Thursday
Squat 325, Bench 159, Pulled 275 =760 Total Took 1st Place

Daniel Tinjero Junior 165 (164 lbs)Thursday
Squat 738, Bench 551, Pulled 639 =1928 Total Took 1st Place and Heavy wt JR Best Lifter

Dutch Flesh Master 220 (40-44)(209 lbs)Friday
Squat 804, Benched 512, Pulled 606 =1922 Took 1st place

Brain Schwab Open 165 (159 lbs)Saturday Unfortunately Disqualified

Kalin Chester Open 165 Bench only Saturday
Bench 573 Took 1st Place & Best Lifter

Joe Jordan is competing today so all I know is he got his 3rd squat 903, bench 621.14, pulled 688.14 waiting for awards info.

Team OBB did very well. Congrats to all!

Tinajero was a 181. Not a 165


Sorry I knew that but 165 stuck in my head.

here a video from metal, it contains mendelson, bolten,gary franks bench accident etc.

john i didnt know your email maybe you can promote this video...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JttWLlgbw0

check out my website and videos

www.alideutscher.de

Brian Kline, how did you do?

Anonymous wrote:
weird that in over two years andy not only hasnt broken the 1003 but hasnt even been able to dublicate it.

do you think maybe hes peaked? i just dont see him improving much these days either?

I was at Worlds on Sunday, and Bolton's strength is something to behold. Some observations about the issue of Bolton's deadlift progress:

When he pulled 1003 in November 2006 at the WPO Semi Finals, I believe Bolton took token squats.

When he attempted 1008 in March 2007 at the WPO Finals (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLX7yx8gixY), this was after squatting 1213 and pulling 920.

When he attempted 1014 at the BPC British Championships in July 2007 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj7ByBNJ2Hs), I believe this was after token squats.

When he attempted 1004 at the BPC British Championships in July 2008 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZcd4MAwuVI), this was after squatting 1102.

When he attempted 1004 yesterday at WPC Worlds, this was after squatting 1146, attempting around 1168 as I recall and missing it due to a technical issue at the top, and pulling 942. I believe his second attempt deadlift in July 2008 was 914.

So, the closest Bolton has been to surpassing his WR was at the July 2007 meet that approximated the conditions where he originally set the record--i.e., where a maximal squat was not attempted. He did get 1004 in the lockout zone in July 2008 with less maximal squats and deadlifts than those done yesterday. In that case, I think he finished with 1102 because he missed his first two attempts on depth.

Anonymous wrote:
To say that the Centre Referee can't judge squat depth is nonsense. Of course it's not as advantageous as a side referee's view, everyone knows that, but that doesn't alter the fact that it's part of his job - that's why we have three referees. Virtually all of the audiense - and usually the video viewing public have a view from the front, and that's never stopped anyone from giving an opinion on squat depth.

Another thing, the Centre Referee can't 'bomb' anyone for depth, it takes two red lights at least, and on three occasions at that.

Bench Press and butt up. The Rules say it's an infringement of the rules, and a cause for failure, for "any change in the elected lifting position or raising of the buttocks....". It doesn't say the butt has to be off the bench. The Centre Referee doesn't have to see daylight between the butt and the bench to fail a lift for raising the buttocks.

If you can't referee all three lifts from the Centre Referee's then don't sit in the chair.

lol... now you're giving reds for the butt just flexing and raising without even seeing daylight.

EVERYONE knows that "RAISING" means "RAISING OFF THE BENCH"

...this has to be a dumb kid posting rattling my cage. you can't be serious.

if for some reason you actually are a real life referee, do everyone a favor and retire. quit immediately. you're ruining my sport with your ignorance.

FOR EVERYONE ELSE... DON'T POST ANY MORE COMMENTS ON THIS THREAD ABOUT HOW RIGHTEOUS YOU ARE ABOUT CALLING SQUAT DEPTH FROM THE FRONT UNLESS YOU CAN SUBMIT A PICTURE/ANIMATION FROM THE FRONT VIEW WITH A PARALLEL LINE DRAWN FROM THE TOP OF THE KNEE TO THE TOP SURFACE OF THE HIP AT THE HIP JOINT.

When you can draw it out and write out a description of how you determine squat depth from the front in technical terms, then let me know and I will start a new thread with your miraculous revelation.

This WPC Worlds Report thread has been hijacked enough with this nonsense.

Einar Hernes wrote:
Why the low deadlift? He has done 800raw before... Did he miss his 3rd?

Donnie pulled his adductor; yet, he was 'bullbog' enough to still get a 760.

Anonymous wrote:
Einar Hernes wrote:
Why the low deadlift? He has done 800raw before... Did he miss his 3rd?

Donnie pulled his adductor; yet, he was 'bullbog' enough to still get a 760.

Donnie is truly amazing

Putt Houston wrote:
FOR EVERYONE ELSE... DON'T POST ANY MORE COMMENTS ON THIS THREAD ABOUT HOW RIGHTEOUS YOU ARE ABOUT CALLING SQUAT DEPTH FROM THE FRONT

Have you EVER seen a squat vid from the front where you considered it too high? Miller's 1200? Grandick's 1st grand? All of Hooper's? (LOL)

Hey Putt, I'm back.

WPC Rulebook 2008, Rules of Performance, Bench Press, Beginning of Paragraph 2:-

"The lifter must lie backwards with the shoulders and buttocks in contact with the flat bench surface. The elected lifting position of the buttocks shall be maintained throughout the attempt."

I've already told you about the Causes for Disqualifcation :-

"Any change in the elected lifting position. Any raising of the buttocks..."

But you still won't have it, will you?

Jim Ray wrote:
Putt Houston wrote:
FOR EVERYONE ELSE... DON'T POST ANY MORE COMMENTS ON THIS THREAD ABOUT HOW RIGHTEOUS YOU ARE ABOUT CALLING SQUAT DEPTH FROM THE FRONT

Have you EVER seen a squat vid from the front where you considered it too high? Miller's 1200? Grandick's 1st grand? All of Hooper's? (LOL)

for fucks sake jim, he said you can call it if its BLATANTLY HIGH, otherwise you dont have a say as the head judge.

i know youre a lot smarter than to misunderstand that, so stop stirring the pot.

Dumb kid wrote:
Hey Putt, I'm back.

WPC Rulebook 2008, Rules of Performance, Bench Press, Beginning of Paragraph 2:-

"The lifter must lie backwards with the shoulders and buttocks in contact with the flat bench surface. The elected lifting position of the buttocks shall be maintained throughout the attempt."

I've already told you about the Causes for Disqualifcation :-

"Any change in the elected lifting position. Any raising of the buttocks..."

But you still won't have it, will you?

the head judge cannot see the butt raising off the bench unless he has x-ray vision. he can see the butt flex from leg drive but there is no possible way to see the butt raising. and if he somehow got out of his seat and looked along the lifters side and did, he isnt watching the bar close enough as he is supposed to.

youre an idiot.

Okay. I'll try again - see if you can understand it.

"The elected position of the buttocks shall be maintained throughout the attempt."

Now, what you do is, lie down on the bench, set youself in the position you want to bench in (with tansed buttocks just on the bench surface if you like) - and then KEEP STILL !!. The only parts that should move after that are your arms and chest (and your head, if you like). Keep everything else exactly where you planted it.

NOW do you get it?

There's no need for all the twitching and shuffling about that goes in here - and the Rules are perfectly clear.

no they arent, you are interpreting them how you see fit. dont read into shit because that is not how that rule is enforced in any federation anywhere. never has been and never will be. if thats how you choose to interpret it, thats fine, but youre wrong and if you are a judge/referee, meet directors will not use you because of it.

Okay, I give in. You're right and I'm wrong. I really only got into this 'discussion' because of silly remarks about what Head Referees couldn't pass judgement on. (I did it as a bit of a wind-up).

But let me just say, the reason we get so much grief on sites such as this is because many of the refereeing decisions blatantly ignore the rules as they're written. I don't care particularly what the rules are, but the least we should expect is that the appropriate decisions are made. We all know that too many poor lifts are passed because the refs won't stick to the rules. That doesn't do the credibility of the aport (any Federation) any favours. And the more the referees allow lifters to 'get away with' the worse it will get, leading to even less credibility I don't blame the lifters - I blame the referees.

Official results:

http://worldpowerliftingcongress.com/WPC%20Results%202008.htm

Dumb kid wrote:
Okay, I give in. You're right and I'm wrong. I really only got into this 'discussion' because of silly remarks about what Head Referees couldn't pass judgement on. (I did it as a bit of a wind-up).

But let me just say, the reason we get so much grief on sites such as this is because many of the refereeing decisions blatantly ignore the rules as they're written. I don't care particularly what the rules are, but the least we should expect is that the appropriate decisions are made. We all know that too many poor lifts are passed because the refs won't stick to the rules. That doesn't do the credibility of the aport (any Federation) any favours. And the more the referees allow lifters to 'get away with' the worse it will get, leading to even less credibility I don't blame the lifters - I blame the referees.

i dont disagree with that at all

Dumb kid wrote:
Okay. I'll try again - see if you can understand it.

"The elected position of the buttocks shall be maintained throughout the attempt."

Now, what you do is, lie down on the bench, set youself in the position you want to bench in (with tansed buttocks just on the bench surface if you like) - and then KEEP STILL !!. The only parts that should move after that are your arms and chest (and your head, if you like). Keep everything else exactly where you planted it.

NOW do you get it?

There's no need for all the twitching and shuffling about that goes in here - and the Rules are perfectly clear.

Dumb Kid, (and I'm just saying that now 'cause it's funny)

I understand what you're screaming man. I'd have to agree that some refs are doing the sport an injustice with letting mile high squats by, some really soft lockouts, etc.

I'm not against the head ref calling depth. I'm against him calling it when it's at or around parallel. You're in the worst possible position to call it. In fact, it is an impossible position if you want to be as technical as you describe in the rule books because one critical point (the hip joint) is blocked by the lifters body. All I'm saying is once that EXACT point is hidden or obscured from view, you don't have the right to call depth. You are guessing where it's at. Why guess when there are two capable refs on each side to determine that for you. At that point in the squat, IT'S THE ONE AND ONLY THING THEY ARE LOOKING AT, so let them do their job.

All apologies for being a jackass in earlier posts. I am passionate about the subject matter to say the least.

lol... let me know when you got that drawing done for me. Leonardo Da Vinci couldn't draw the lifter squatting from the front with a parallel line from the top of the knee to the top surface of the leg at the hip joint. Picasso might have, cause that weirdo drew some f*cked up sh*t, all out of perception.

Please tell me what federation you ref for. I don't ever want to bench with you as a ref, and get a red light for my ass flexing up as I press upwards. I think my attitude would jump from David Banner to the angry green guy in one split second once I found out what the red light was for.

Seriously, list your fed, so I can NEVER lift there again. No harm, just let me avoid you.

This thread rulz.

In response to the earlier anonymous posting claiming to be from a referee, I would just like to add that I am also a referee. I don't like to brag, but I'm probably the most famous referee in the sport. You've probably heard of me before. My real name is Cy D'Judge.

Putt, when I sit in the Head Referees chair I dob't sit leaning forward with my face about six inches from the bar and can't see anything except the lifter's chest and the centre of the bar. I don't have a bunch of spotters in between me and most of the action. I can see virtually all of the bar, all of the lifter (and, if you sit slightly off-centre you can see one side of the hips). I can see if the spotters get hold of the bar, I can see his feet under the bench - mostly.

So it ain't the WPC, is it?

And I've been doing it a long, long time - and with no complaints that I've ever heard voiced in any way except a polite question.

theBarzeen wrote:
Jose Garcia went 1041-645~830's for 2525.... has anyone heard how the overall WPO stuff went?

Frankle took the middle weight and Bolton took the heavy weight one. SOme other guy from the East took the light weight price. Each were given $2,500.

Dumb kid wrote:
Putt, when I sit in the Head Referees chair I dob't sit leaning forward with my face about six inches from the bar and can't see anything except the lifter's chest and the centre of the bar. I don't have a bunch of spotters in between me and most of the action. I can see virtually all of the bar, all of the lifter (and, if you sit slightly off-centre you can see one side of the hips). I can see if the spotters get hold of the bar, I can see his feet under the bench - mostly.

So it ain't the WPC, is it?

And I've been doing it a long, long time - and with no complaints that I've ever heard voiced in any way except a polite question.

So I should avoid the AAU? LOL!!

Alright, I get some of it. No one lifts heavy enough that they need a bunch of spotters protecting the lifter. So stop being bashful.. what fed do I avoid you in?

you're anonymous, and now your federation is anonymous? WTF is up with the cloak and dagger routine? It's not like you reperesent the whole federation?... or hell, I don't know, maybe you do. Maybe that's why we're playing marco polo with this whole thread. all you got to say is don't lift in the USAPL or don't come to Ohio, or don't lift in Texas or wherever....

come on man, hook a brother up already.

word

hey Putt I want u to join our website follow the link below and check us out.
http://gladiatorpowerlifting.ning.com/group/800lbsbenchpressclub

Well, it isn't a fed that allows seven spotters for squats (even though the rules say a maximum of five), every bencher to bring his own lift-off team, and every attempt to have everyone in the building who's wearing his cap backwards and has a camers or mobile on the platform while the lifting's going on. No wonder the refs can't see anything - and, if they can't see it, they can't fail it.