


Was IPF's Punishment of Russia Appropriate?
This week's announcement by the IPF that Russia would be suspended for a third time for doping violations came with little surprise. However, unlike the previous two suspensions, this time only the RPF's open teams were suspended from international and regional competitions.
In addition, whereas a single international failure violated the federation's last two probations and triggered a new suspension, now it will require four international or regional violations in a 12 month period. Furthermore, that standard is no different than what any other country (including those in good standing) face.
The IPF cites the continued progress by the RPF in 2007 and 2008 toward doping reform as cause to soften their punishment. During that time, the federation has established a domestic OCT program, made significant progress on whereabouts reporting, and cooperated with IPF out of competition testing in the country.
Are the terms of Russia's newest suspension fair? Is the message sent with this punishment, especially as it is the third since September of 2006, a sound one? Is the IPF getting closer to what they want from Russia on the anti-doping front? Does the fact that the IPF suffers from the RPF being excluded, effect their decision regarding a suspension? Will other federation's benefit from this suspension?
Discussion on the topic continues at Brad Madvig's USAPL forum, the CPU forum, and Go Heavy. Here is a sampling of opinions.
CPU Vice President Louis Levesque: "It was probably one bad apple in the tree but the rule clearly stated that one strike and you're out!"
Steve Powell, "I don't feel the whole team should be out over two failed tests. It is really not fair to the other lifters from that nation."
Jon Stewart: "Thats why only the Open team was suspended, the RPF is slowly getting the point and are making an effort to clean up their track record. That was a condition of the last suspension...its not like they hadn't been given two chances before this suspension, clean up your drug testing program and if you don't the next positive will result in another suspension. The IPF stuck to their word...don't really see a problem with that."
Jamie Emberley: "There are two ways of looking at things. I believe if you get caught cheating you deserve to be banned, the warning was given. However, I would not go so far as saying they are shit for doing so. People like seeing the high lifts, people watch the Olympics which are loaded with drugs, and most don't get caught. The IPF is drug tested sure, but It is also the most prestigious to win. Therefore, people will do what it takes to win, just like the olympics, or track and field. Most people don't look at the other federations as legitimate options. I am just happy the rules are being followed and IPF is not going back on their word. I love watching those guys in action, love watching Ed Coan lift. However, I am competing too, and if it puts me up a spot, im all for it."
Garry Holmen: "It just seems pretty heavy handed to suspend an entire organization over a failed OMT of one lifter. If they are following the rules now I would think there going to catch more people than some organization that has been successfully drug testing and been anti-doping for years."
Tony Cardella: "Yeah, I think suspending the whole federation over previous failures and 1 OMT is heavy handed. I guess it depends on the size of the problem. Is it one or two people here and there or is it federation wide?"
Rich Edinger says tongue in cheek: "But they can continue to dope at Teenage, Junior, and Master Worlds without a suspension?"
Tom Isbell: "smack their bottoms and then let them back in again."














