Eleiko Powerlifting Plates, Bars and Collars - Official USA Distributor



IPF Removes Controversial "Ed Coan Rule"

The IPF has removed controversial Article 10.11 from its newest Anti-Doping Rules (pdf) which will become effective on January 1, 2009 if ratified at the 2008 Congress meeting in November.

Article 10.11, also known as Rule 10.11 or the Ed Coan Rule, penalized those who merely participated in the same competition as IPF-suspended lifters. Lifters and officials received a six month suspension for "participating in any division, section or bodyweight class of that contest or competition who has been expelled or suspended from his or her international or national federation or who is subject to Ineligibility for a doping related offence."

In addition, former Rule 10.9, which addressed ones status during ineligibility, is now Rule 10.10. The article has been expanded and clarified but still prohibits suspended lifters from competing and participating in other federations and even in other sports. Rule 10.9 was recently used to suspend Darren Matsumoto for competing in another federation while under suspension by the IPF.

The new Anti-Doping rules also have added extensive explanatory comments to many of the articles.

Old Rule 10.11:

10.11 Penalty for Participating while Ineligibility or Against Suspended Athletes

An Athlete or official cannot participate in contests or competitions if:

10.11.1 Article 10.9 above is applicable,

or

10.11.2 There is any Athlete or official participating in any division, section or bodyweight class of that contest or competition who has been expelled or suspended from his or her international or national federation or who is subject to Ineligibility for a doping related offence.

Penalties:

For participating while Ineligible:

Six (6) months elongation to Ineligibility.

First offence against this rule will elongate by six (6) months the period of Ineligibility originally imposed to the Athlete or other person violating this rule.

Second and subsequent offences will elongate the previously elongated Ineligibility by six (6) months per each violation.

For competing against an Athlete who have been expelled or is under a period of Ineligibility:

Six (6) months Ineligibility commencing from the date of violation.

The determination of the applicability or otherwise of penalties under this Article shall be made by the IPF Disciplinary Committee. Prior to any such determination by the Disciplinary Committee, the IPF-EC may provisionally suspend the athlete, such suspension to commence from the date of the alleged violation.

Old Rule 10.9:

10.9 Status during Ineligibility

No Person who has been declared Ineligible may, during the period of Ineligibility, participate in any capacity in an Event or activity (other than authorized anti-doping education or rehabilitation programs). This would preclude, but not be limited to:
a. practising/training with a national team;
b. acting as a coach or sport official;
c. selection in any representative team;
d. competing in any Competition/Events;
e. receiving, directly or indirectly, funding or assistance from National Federation;
f. use of official National Federation or Member facilities;
g. holding any position with the National Federation.
In addition, for any anti-doping rule violation not involving specified substances described in Article 10.3, some or all sport-related financial support or other sport-related benefits received by such Person will be withheld by IPF and its National Federations. A Person subject to a period of Ineligibility longer than four years may, after completing four years of the period of Ineligibility, participate in local sport events in a sport other than sports subject to the jurisdiction of IPF and its National Federations, but only so long as the local sport event is not at a level that could otherwise qualify such Person directly or indirectly to compete in (or accumulate points toward) a national championship or International Event.

2009 Rule 10.10:

10.10 Status During Ineligibility

10.10.1 Prohibition against Participation during Ineligibility

No Athlete or other Person who has been declared Ineligible may, during the period of
Ineligibility, participate in any capacity in an Event or activity (other than authorized
anti-doping education or rehabilitation programs) authorized or organized by the IPF
or any National Federation or a club or other member organization of the IPF or any
National Federation, or in Competitions authorized or organized by any professional
league or any international or national level Event organization.

This would preclude, but not be limited to:
a) practising/training with a national team, or a club or other member organization of
the IPF’s member organization;
b) acting as a coach or sport official;
c) selection in any representative team;
d) receiving, directly or indirectly, funding or assistance from National Federation;
e) use of official National Federation or Member facilities;
f) holding any position with the National Federation.

An Athlete or other Person subject to a period of Ineligibility longer than four years
may, after completing four years of the period of Ineligibility, participate in local sport
events in a sport other than sports subject to the jurisdiction of the IPF and its
National Federations, but only so long as the local sport event is not at a level that
could otherwise qualify such Person directly or indirectly to compete in (or accumulate
points toward) a national championship or International Event.

An Athlete or other Person subject to a period of Ineligibility shall remain subject to
Testing.

[Comment to Article 10.10.1: For example, an ineligible Athlete cannot participate in a training camp, exhibition or practice organized by his or her National Federation or a club which is a member of that National Federation. Further, an ineligible Athlete may not compete in a non-Signatory professional league (e.g., the National Hockey League, the National Basketball Association, etc.), Events organized by a non-Signatory International Event organization or a non- Signatory national-level event organization without triggering the consequences set forth in Article 10.10.2. Sanctions in one sport will also be recognized by other sports (see Article 15).]

10.10.2 Violation of the Prohibition of Participation during Ineligibility

Where an Athlete or other Person who has been declared Ineligible violates the
prohibition against participation during Ineligibility described in Article 10.10.1, the
results of such participation shall be Disqualified and the period of Ineligibility which
was originally imposed shall start over again as of the date of the violation. The new
period of Ineligibility may be reduced under Article 10.5.2 if the Athlete or other
Person establishes he or she bears No Significant Fault or Negligence for violating the
prohibition against participation. The determination of whether an Athlete or other
Person has violated the prohibition against participation, and whether a reduction
under Article 10.5.2 is appropriate, shall be made by the IPF.

[Comment to Article 10.10.2: If an Athlete or other Person is alleged to have violated the
prohibition against participation during a period of Ineligibility, the IPF shall determine whether the Athlete violated the prohibition and, if so, whether the Athlete or other Person has established grounds for a reduction in the restarted period of Ineligibility under Article 10.5.2. Decisions rendered by the IPF under this Article may be appealed pursuant to Article 13.2. Where an Athlete Support Personnel or other Person substantially assists an Athlete in violating the prohibition against participation during Ineligibility, the IPF may appropriately impose sanctions under its own disciplinary rules for such assistance.]

10.10.3 Withholding of Financial Support during Ineligibility

In addition, for any anti-doping rule violation not involving a reduced sanction for
Specified Substances as described in Article 10.4, some or all sport-related financial
support or other sport-related benefits received by such Person will be withheld by the
IPF and its National Federations.


Match.com

Comment viewing options

But won't they get suspended anyway? as competing against any suspended individual would have to be in a non-IPF meet, meaning they would still get suspended???

huh?

These seems like a move in the right direction. Especially in the U.S. where there are so many feds to compete in.

Anonymouss wrote:
But won't they get suspended anyway? as competing against any suspended individual would have to be in a non-IPF meet, meaning they would still get suspended???

huh?

There is no such rule barring lifters from competing outside of the IPF unless it is in a world level meet.

siders took it on the chin and didn't say anything because he is a genuine good guy. it's a damn shame this came a couple years to late for him.

A step in the right direction!

Didn't Siders get 2 years for that? It looks like the old rule was a 6-month suspension.

This is definitely a good move.

All I can say is finally! - never thought this rule was fair, and One of my biggest bones to pick with the IPF. Yeah yeah yeah, i know it'll probably never apply to even a quarter of all the lifters out there.... But it was ridiculous.

Marcus wrote:
Didn't Siders get 2 years for that? It looks like the old rule was a 6-month suspension.

This is definitely a good move.

The penalty was shortened from one year to six months following Siders' suspension. Siders missed two Worlds but was only suspended for one year.

This is too little, too late. IPF has not made sense for years now and it has driven down the market for doing IPF meets. There are too many other options and they are out of touch with the lifters anyway. The nonsense of extending the banishing of lifters like Matsumoto for competing at anything except an IPF meet is just more proof they don't care about the challenges of their member organizations in retention of members and trying to attract new ones. It is not just USAPL that will face lifter defections, as more options develop in europe and russia perhaps has had enough?

like them or not at least they got this right finally. they are still the premier fed.

Mr Putt where are you? thanks to all your double secret probations and suspensions they probably got tired of adding them up...good job!

Putt's off having a luau (spelling?) on the island with Darren. They're over there surfing, eating the occasional roasted pig, talking to island girls, and lifting every now and then.

Good. This rule was fuckn stoopid anyway.

What's next ? Instant replay ? Good move on IPF's part. Finally !

Staff wrote:
Anonymouss wrote:
But won't they get suspended anyway? as competing against any suspended individual would have to be in a non-IPF meet, meaning they would still get suspended???

huh?

There is no such rule barring lifters from competing outside of the IPF unless it is in a world level meet.

What about this?

http://www.powerliftingwatch.com/node/8410

If you're a high profile/top lifter, I think you'd get suspended even if it wasn't an international meet?

there is more to that story than is presented in that post...

d.m. wrote:
Putt's off having a luau (spelling?) on the island with Darren. They're over there surfing, eating the occasional roasted pig, talking to island girls, and lifting every now and then.

That should get you both another 6 months suspention.

The IPF wouldn't make a move unless it had to, this is not pro action it is reaction to the heat from other international organizations. Basicly they move to slow too late.

JC Carter wrote:
there is more to that story than is presented in that post...

Care to elaborate?

Anonymouss wrote:
Staff wrote:
Anonymouss wrote:
But won't they get suspended anyway? as competing against any suspended individual would have to be in a non-IPF meet, meaning they would still get suspended???

huh?

There is no such rule barring lifters from competing outside of the IPF unless it is in a world level meet.

What about this?

http://www.powerliftingwatch.com/node/8410

If you're a high profile/top lifter, I think you'd get suspended even if it wasn't an international meet?

It's never happened in the U.S.

Anonymouss wrote:
Staff wrote:
Anonymouss wrote:
But won't they get suspended anyway? as competing against any suspended individual would have to be in a non-IPF meet, meaning they would still get suspended???

huh?

There is no such rule barring lifters from competing outside of the IPF unless it is in a world level meet.

What about this?

http://www.powerliftingwatch.com/node/8410

If you're a high profile/top lifter, I think you'd get suspended even if it wasn't an international meet?

It's never happened in the U.S.

This is how it should have been all the time. Good move.

I don't really understand the rational for stopping somebody from moving into another sport while deemed ineligible. Can anybody give me a rational?

Who the hell would lift with an organization which dictates with whom and where you can compete? F'That, too damn hokey for a sport which is only a hobby to most. Since I am a nobody with average lifts, I don't matter really, but for elite lifters who bring a crowd to watch, I would think that they would fling their fingers to thier noses and leave.

Anonymouss wrote:
But won't they get suspended anyway? as competing against any suspended individual would have to be in a non-IPF meet, meaning they would still get suspended???

huh?

There is no punishment for competing in non-IPF meets

Россия - чемпион!!!

Post new comment



The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

*

  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
Verify comment authorship
Captcha Image: you will need to recognize the text in it.
*
Please type in the letters/numbers that are shown in the image above.