Ivanko Powerlifting Weightlifting Plates and Bars - Official Distributor



The Status Of IPF Rules 14.9 & 10.11

With a meeting of the IPF Congress planned for October 14, some had hoped that Article 14.9 of the Constitution and Article 10.11 of the Anti-Doping Rules, respectively known as Rule 14.9 and Rule 10.11, would be addressed. Rule 14.9 bars lifters from competing in international competitions not sanctioned by the IPF. Rule 10.11 bars lifters from competing with suspended lifters.

The IPF Congress agenda (pdf) does carry a proposal which could carve out exceptions to Rule 14.9. However, all exceptions would be based on permission being granted by the General Secretary. The proposal also contains an appeals clause.

There are no proposals in the agenda which address Rule 10.11.

Proposed Constitutional change:

14. 9 Participating in Non-IPF Competition (Puerto Rico)

It should be add the following

Sec. A- When a Federation ask permission to the General Secretary of the IPF. to enter a none sanction meet by the IPF. It should be evaluated in what way will this meet will harmed the good name of the IPF. If this Federation will compete on this event with the premised establish by the General Secretary.

Sec. B- If the General Secretary denies the petition then the Federation has the right to appeal it to the Law and Legislation Committee.

Purpose: If this situation benefits the Federation that's make the petition and in no way will it harmed the IPF good name then this permission must be granted.

Rule 14.9:

14.9 Participating in Non-IPF Competition

Any lifter, coach, referee or official who competes or participates in an international Powerlifting or Bench Press competition not organised, sanctioned or approved by the IPF shall not be permitted to take part in any IPF international or regional competition for a period of 12 months from the date of that non-approved competition.

Rule 10.11

10.11 Penalty for Participating while Ineligibility or Against Suspended Athletes

An Athlete or official cannot participate in contests or competitions if:

10.11.1 Article 10.9 above is applicable,

or

10.11.2 There is any Athlete or official participating in any division, section or bodyweight class of that contest or competition who has been expelled or suspended from his or her international or national federation or who is subject to Ineligibility for a doping related offence.

Penalties:

For participating while Ineligible:

Six (6) months elongation to Ineligibility.

First offence against this rule will elongate by six (6) months the period of Ineligibility originally imposed to the Athlete or other person violating this rule.

Second and subsequent offences will elongate the previously elongated Ineligibility by six (6) months per each violation.

For competing against an Athlete who have been expelled or is under a period of Ineligibility:

Six (6) months Ineligibility commencing from the date of violation.

The determination of the applicability or otherwise of penalties under this Article shall be made by the IPF Disciplinary Committee. Prior to any such determination by the Disciplinary Committee, the IPF-EC may provisionally suspend the athlete, such suspension to commence from the date of the alleged violation.


Match.com

Comment viewing options

wow. guilt by association.

rule 14.9 HAS GOT TO GO!!!

This rule is so stupid. I have a short story about this I heard first hand. I know of an IPF lifter who was competing in a very small IPF meet and a freind was helping her who is a very well known WPO lifter. The head judge proceded to notify her that she was to recieive no help from the WPO lifter. He was allowed to speak to her but couldn't touch her. This league sounds like a cult rather a powerlifting league. I guess me and my woman must lift in either IPF or everything else or I can't touch her ever again. LOL

Frank Caminita wrote:
I know of an IPF lifter who was competing in a very small IPF meet
First, it was a USAPL meet, not an international meet. Second, the judge was wrong. Unless the lifter has been suspended by the USAPL then the lifter should have been allowed to receive help. A complaint should have been lodged with an Athletes Rep at a later date.

This meet wasn't in the U.S. I am talking about but I am not suprised it happend somewhere else. In this meet the lifter was being helped by the WPO lifter to put her suit straps on and he wasn't even a banned lifter in the WPO so I don't get it.

Somehow I doubt that a later complaint would have resulted in any action, for a number of reasons. Sure the rule is pretty clearly worded, but then again, so is the rule on squat depth, and we see how well that works.

What's with the word play? If you want to know if the story is true or not, give the names of the people involved. Otherwise you have no credibility and it's just a rumor....

as an IPF lifter who has chosen to do other federation worlds rather than IPF for two years now, all i can say is 14.9 is still extremely stupid and part of the reason I went elsewhere.

10.11 is a problem for lifters since we cannot know who will be there and it is all encompassing.

both rules are aimed at controlling IPF lifters and this goes against the very nature of man. We are not the serfs or property of IPF. Nor do they stand in loco parentis.

The more they seek to restrict opportunity for lifters, the fewer will agree to stay in their boundaries. There is far more opportunity throughout the world than there was 10 years ago.

The world is no longer flat, but IPF would have us believe we sail off its edges if we do not stay in their 14.9 and 10.11 boundaries.

How can you seriously believe in IPF after they returned rus and ukr back in after waving the rules at them and a light spanking anyway. Their strict enforcement of 14.9 and 10.11 is more than they do to enforce the alleged wada rule upkeep.

clearly the attempt to modify 14.9 benefits europeans who wish to do another worlds, and their federation also is in agreement with the lifters there.

it's difficult to picture USAPL asking for exemptions and IPF granting them for all the federations with tested meets that might fall under 14.9 for Americans. I do not think USAPL is willing to do so either...

So the Europeans would be able to do as they liked if this passed, and Americans just as suspended for doing worlds in other federations...

Frank Caminita wrote:
This rule is so stupid. I have a short story about this I heard first hand. I know of an IPF lifter who was competing in a very small IPF meet and a freind was helping her who is a very well known WPO lifter. The head judge proceded to notify her that she was to recieive no help from the WPO lifter. He was allowed to speak to her but couldn't touch her. This league sounds like a cult rather a powerlifting league. I guess me and my woman must lift in either IPF or everything else or I can't touch her ever again. LOL

I don't buy that for a second.

What ya don't buy. You think it didn't happen. The meet was in Finland and was an IPF meet (not USAPL). It was told to me by somebody who communitated direcly with the lifter who this happened too and believe me my source is very reliable. My only question is was this rule interperted incorrectly by the head judge and was he totally out line or is this the way it goes?

Post new comment



The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

*

  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
Verify comment authorship
Captcha Image: you will need to recognize the text in it.
*
Please type in the letters/numbers that are shown in the image above.